Ratings Policy
GameFunn.org uses editorial labels to help visitors understand why a game is highlighted. We do not present user-review style decimal ratings unless we have a real public rating source and can explain where the score comes from.
How Editorial Labels Are Chosen
Homepage labels such as Trending, Editor Review Pick, Fast Load Feel, Strong Replay Loop, and Mobile Friendly are internal editorial summaries. They are based on practical review criteria rather than crowdsourced scoring.
The main factors we consider are first-session clarity, loading reliability, control readability, device fit, and replay value. We may also consider whether a game stands out compared with nearby titles in the same category.
What We Do Not Claim
These labels are not claims about global popularity, app-store ranking, or verified user sentiment unless a page explicitly cites that source. They are not meant to imitate a review platform score.
We avoid precise decimal ratings such as 4.8 out of 5 when there is no trustworthy external rating source attached to the page.
Current Editorial Criteria
Our most common editorial checks are whether the game opens with a clear objective, whether the first round feels fair, whether mobile play blocks important UI, whether the embedded frame loads consistently, and whether the game gives a reason to replay after one attempt.
These checks are qualitative. They are intended to guide visitors, not to simulate a precision scoring system that the site does not actually maintain.
How This Connects to the Editorial Policy
The broader writing and maintenance standards for GameFunn live in our Editorial Policy. This Ratings Policy is narrower and only explains how highlighted labels and homepage callouts should be interpreted.